Disclaimer: While we are happy to advise on developing systematic review searches, we may not have the capacity to create or perform the search for you.
This guide is recommended as a source of good practice by agencies such as the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme, and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and has been used widely both nationally and internationally. Their aim is to promote high standards in commissioning and conduct, by providing practical guidance for undertaking systematic reviews evaluating the effects of health interventions.
The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) conducts systematic reviews in the fields of Education, Health Promotion and Public Health, as well as social welfare and international development.
Standards developed by the National Academies of Science, Health, and Medicine (formerly IOM) for systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research of therapeutic medical or surgical interventions.
The PRISMA statement is a checklist and flow diagram to help systematic review and meta-analyses authors assess and report on the benefits and harms of a healthcare intervention.
The Campbell Collaboration is an international research network that produces systematic reviews of the effects of social interventions in Crime & Justice, Education, International Development, and Social Welfare.
Revised version of the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). This 16 item checklist helps you assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.