SR Search Tools
Disclaimer: While we are happy to advise on developing systematic review searches, we may not have the capacity to create or perform the search for you.
Due to current Executive Orders for the review of federal websites, including the Department of Health and Human Services, federal data sources and documents may be temporarily unavailable. If you are unable to access a federal website, please use the Internet Archive, which may have an archived copy of the website [https://web.archive.org/ ].
Identify databases and search terms
- Identify databases to conduct your search
You should plan to search at least 3 databases. Most reviewers expect to see Medline (either via PubMed or Ovid) as one of the databases for health topics. Additional databases should be included based on your subject area. For a list of all available databases, consult the USF Health Libraries A to Z database list.
- Identify search terms to conduct your search
Searches for a systematic review need to be both comprehensive (prioritizing sensitivity over specificity) and reproducible. To make your search comprehensive, identify both key words and controlled vocabulary to describe the main concepts of your question.
- Develop search strategies for each database
Combine terms using appropriate Boolean operators and subject headings (if applicable) for every database. Searches should be as similar as possible between the database.
Consider meeting with a librarian
No matter how experienced you are in searching PubMed and the medical literature, you will likely need help creating a search strategy that meets the guidelines for evidence synthesis in the health sciences. In fact, both the Cochrane Handbook and the Institute of Medicine recommend including a librarian trained in systematic review searching on your team.
While this may not be possible, you may wish to consult with a librarian early in the process to ensure that you do not miss critical terms and databases in your search. Once you have developed your search strategy, you may also wish to request that a librarian conduct a peer review of your strategy. This will ensure that your review is in compliance with Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) guidelines for systematic reviews.
-
Make a Systematic Review Consult appointment with a librarianSet up an appointment to meet with a health librarian. Select Systematic Review Consult and upload your protocol. This will ensure that your appointment time is most effective. Please note that a systematic review consult does not mean that the librarian is automatically a part of your systematic review team.
-
PRISMA-SearchThe PRISMA extension for searching checklist includes 16 reporting items, each of which is detailed with exemplar reporting and rationale. Available as a PDF, Word, or Excel document.
-
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline StatementMcGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-46. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
Conduct searches
- Run each search in the databases you selected, documenting your search strategy for each one. You should include these in your manuscript, typically as an appendix.
- Consider searching additional literature sources to reduce the risk of publication bias in your review
- clinical trial registries
- conference proceedings and reports
- white papers
- theses and dissertations
- For more information on grey literature, see the USF Health Libraries "Grey Literature" guide.
Record numbers in a PRISMA flowchart
The PRISMA diagram shows the flow of records through the phases of a systematic review. It maps the number of records identified, included and excluded, record sources, and the reasons for exclusions. Different templates are available depending on the type of review (new or updated) and sources used in the review.
